Jet Fuel Quality Control Standards at Airports: A Guide

Jet fuel quality control at airports is governed by a layered system where product specifications meet operational standards and audit programs verify compliance. ATA Specification 103, published by Airlines for America (A4A) and current at revision 2017.2, is the definitive handling standard that bridges the gap between refinery release and wing delivery for Jet A and Jet A-1.

This guide explains how ATA 103 differs from ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91, how IFQP and JIG audits align with the standard, and what mandatory tests, sampling procedures, and acceptance criteria apply at receipt, in storage, and through filtration. You will learn the documentation chain from refinery Certificate of Quality through airport release, the pass/fail limits for critical receipt tests, and the daily, weekly, and monthly workflows that keep fuel fit for flight.

ATA Specification 103: The Definitive Standard for Airport Jet Fuel Quality Control

ATA Specification 103 is the globally recognized standard that governs the quality control of aviation fuel at airports from receipt into storage through delivery into aircraft. Published by Airlines for America (A4A) and maintained by the ATA Fuel Committee, the current 2017.2 revision establishes mandatory procedures for sampling, testing, filtration, additive injection, and personnel training that airport fuel operators must follow to ensure Jet A and Jet A-1 remain fit for flight. Unlike product specifications that define what the fuel must be at the refinery gate, ATA 103 defines how the fuel must be handled, monitored, and documented at the airport to preserve that quality through the supply chain.

ATA 103 scope and current revision authority

ATA 103 scope and current revision authority covers all airport fuel facilities including storage tanks, hydrant systems, refuelers, and hydrant dispensers. The standard applies to both commercial and military operations where Jet A or Jet A-1 is handled. Revision authority rests with the ATA Fuel Committee which includes representatives from major airlines, oil companies, and airport operators. The 2017.2 edition introduced updated microbial monitoring protocols, revised water separation requirements for filter vessels, and expanded documentation mandates for traceability. Compliance is verified through IATA Fuel Quality Pool audits and Joint Inspection Group inspections at member locations. JIG standards are followed at more than 2750 airports and supply and distribution locations according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026).

How ATA 103 differs from ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91

How ATA 103 differs from ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91 lies in the distinction between product specification and handling standard. ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91 define the physical and chemical properties the fuel must meet at the point of manufacture such as freeze point, flash point, and thermal stability. ATA 103 does not redefine those properties. Instead it prescribes the operational controls, test frequencies, and acceptance criteria needed to ensure the fuel continues to meet those specifications after it leaves the refinery. Approximately 45% of the world's jet fuel is supplied through JIG member facilities operating under JIG standards according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026), and those facilities align their airport operations with ATA 103 requirements.

Mandatory vs. recommended practices in the standard

Mandatory vs. recommended practices in the standard are clearly delineated by the use of "shall" for mandatory requirements and "should" for recommended practices. Mandatory items include daily water checks on storage tanks, filter vessel differential pressure monitoring during every receipt and delivery, and FSII concentration verification at each injection point. Recommended practices include certain enhanced microbial testing frequencies and specific tank cleaning intervals that may be adjusted based on local operating history. Operators must document compliance with all mandatory requirements to pass IFQP and JIG audits. Recommended practices become mandatory when adopted into an operator's approved quality control manual. JIG standards are followed by over 100 member organisations globally according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026).

Aspect	ATA 103 (2017.2)	ASTM D1655	DEF STAN 91-91
Primary Focus	Airport handling & QC procedures	Product specification at refinery gate	Product specification (UK/NATO)
Scope	Receipt, storage, filtration, delivery	Fuel properties & test methods	Fuel properties & test methods
Mandatory Language	"Shall" for QC actions	"Shall" for property limits	"Shall" for property limits
Audit Basis	IFQP, JIG audits	Refinery CoA verification	Military/UK regulatory audit
Additive Control	Injection point verification	Approved additive list & limits	Approved additive list & limits

The table above illustrates the complementary roles each document plays. ATA 103 operationalizes the property limits set by ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91 through daily, weekly, and monthly test schedules at the airport. While the product specifications define what the fuel must be, ATA 103 defines what the airport must do to keep it that way. Audit programs like IFQP and JIG use ATA 103 as their primary checklist for airport facility compliance.

Regulatory Framework: How ATA 103, JIG, IFQP, ASTM D1655, and DEF STAN 91-91 Work Together

The aviation fuel quality system operates as a layered framework where product specifications, handling standards, and audit programs each perform a distinct function. ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91 establish the baseline fuel properties required for safe turbine engine operation. ATA 103 translates those properties into operational controls for airport storage and delivery. IATA Fuel Quality Pool (IFQP) and Joint Inspection Group (JIG) then audit facilities against ATA 103 to verify compliance. This hierarchy ensures that fuel meeting the refinery gate specification arrives at the aircraft wing unchanged.

Product specs vs. handling standards distinction

Product specs vs. handling standards distinction is the foundation of the regulatory framework. ASTM D1655 and DEF STAN 91-91 specify over 20 fuel properties including distillation curve, viscosity, and lubricity with defined test methods and acceptance limits. These standards are the basis for the Certificate of Quality issued at the refinery. ATA 103 does not duplicate those limits. Instead it mandates the checks such as daily Clear and Bright visual inspection, weekly water separation index testing, and monthly microbial monitoring that confirm the fuel has not degraded during transport and storage. The handling standard bridges the gap between refinery release and wing delivery.

IATA Fuel Quality Pool audit alignment with ATA 103

IATA Fuel Quality Pool audit alignment with ATA 103 means that IFQP auditors use ATA 103 as the primary audit checklist for airport fuel facilities. Airlines participating in IFQP accept fuel at audited locations without requiring individual airline audits. The audit covers storage tank integrity, filtration performance, additive injection records, personnel training files, and document retention. Findings are categorized as Level 1 (critical), Level 2 (major), or Level 3 (minor) with defined corrective action timelines. An airport that passes an IFQP audit is listed in the IFQP directory accessible to all member airlines.

Joint Inspection Group standards for smaller airports

Joint Inspection Group standards for smaller airports provide a scaled compliance pathway for locations that do not have the throughput to justify full IFQP membership. JIG standards are followed at more than 2750 airports and supply and distribution locations according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026). Approximately 45% of the world's jet fuel is supplied through JIG member facilities operating under JIG standards according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026). JIG standards are followed by over 100 member organisations globally according to Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026). JIG inspections also reference ATA 103 but apply a risk-based frequency for certain tests based on volume and turnover. Many regional airports and military airfields operate under JIG oversight. JIG membership includes both oil companies and airlines, creating a shared audit pool that reduces duplicate inspections across the network.

Element	ASTM D1655 / DEF STAN 91-91	ATA 103	IFQP / JIG
Role	Product specification	Handling & QC standard	Audit & oversight programs
Issued By	ASTM International / UK MOD	Airlines for America (A4A)	IATA / Joint Inspection Group
Applies To	Refinery output & CoA	Airport fuel facilities	Operators at audited locations
Key Output	Certificate of Quality	Quality Control Manual	Audit Report & Listing
Enforcement	Contractual / Regulatory	Audit findings / Airline acceptance	Membership suspension / Delisting

The table maps how each layer supports the next. The product specification sets the target. The handling standard defines the daily workflow to hit that target at the airport. The audit programs verify the workflow is executed and documented. A fuel buyer or airport operator needing to verify a supplier's compliance should request the current IFQP or JIG audit report for the specific airport location. This is more actionable than a refinery Certificate of Quality alone because it confirms the fuel was protected through the last mile. For broader market intelligence on fuel supply chains and trade flows, petroleum product specifications and regulatory guides provide additional context on how these standards interact in global trade.

Fuel Supply Chain Traceability: Refinery Certification Through Airport Receipt

Refinery Certificate of Quality requirements

A refinery Certificate of Quality (CoQ) is the primary document that establishes jet fuel conformity at the point of manufacture. The CoQ lists every test result required by the applicable product specification such as ASTM D1655 or DEF STAN 91-91 including API gravity flash point freeze point and thermal stability. It certifies that the batch meets all mandatory properties before it leaves the refinery gate. The document must identify the refinery the batch number the manufacturing date and the specification revision. Any additive injection such as FSII or static dissipator additive is recorded with the exact concentration. The CoQ travels with the batch through the supply chain and becomes the baseline for all subsequent recertification decisions.

Terminal release documentation and recertification points

When fuel moves from the refinery to a primary terminal and onward to airport storage each custody transfer requires a release document. The terminal operator reviews the incoming CoQ and performs identity tests typically API gravity and visual appearance to confirm the fuel has not been contaminated during transit. If the fuel passes the terminal issues a release certificate referencing the original refinery batch number. At some terminals a full recertification test slate is run if the fuel has been stored beyond a defined period or if commingling has occurred. Every release document must preserve the unbroken chain of batch identity linking back to the original refinery CoQ.

Batch traceability and commingling rules at airport receipt

At airport receipt the fuel farm operator verifies the terminal release certificate against the incoming shipment documentation. Commingling of batches is permitted only when both batches carry valid CoQs meeting the same specification and when the resulting blend remains within all specification limits. The airport must record the volume and batch number of each compartment received and calculate the composite batch identity for the storage tank. This composite record becomes the new traceability baseline for all downstream quality control tests. Any discrepancy in documentation or test results triggers a hold procedure until the supply chain investigator resolves the variance.

Receiving Fuel at the Airport: Sampling Procedures, Test Requirements, and Acceptance Criteria

Sampling locations and composite sample methodology

Sampling occurs at the airport fuel farm receipt header before fuel enters the storage tanks. A composite sample is drawn continuously throughout the offload using a flow proportional sampler or by taking timed manual grabs from the receipt line. The composite represents the entire shipment and must be collected in a clean certified container with a minimum volume of one liter for the full test slate. The sampler purges the line before collection to remove residual product. Sample containers are sealed labeled with date time flight number batch number and sampler identity then stored at ambient temperature pending analysis. Proper composite sampling ensures the test results reflect the true condition of the delivered fuel.

Required receipt tests: API gravity flash point freeze point FSII water reaction MSEP particulate

The mandatory receipt test slate verifies that the delivered fuel matches the CoQ and has not degraded during transport. API gravity confirms the correct grade and detects contamination with lighter or heavier products. Flash point screens for volatile contamination such as gasoline or avgas. Freeze point ensures the fuel meets the operational temperature requirements for the airport location. FSII concentration is measured by refractive index or gas chromatography to confirm anti-icing protection. The water reaction test detects surfactants that could impair water separation. MSEP rating evaluates the fuel's ability to release entrained water through filter separators. Particulate contamination is measured by automatic particle counter or membrane filter gravimetric method.

Acceptance criteria table with pass/fail limits

Test Parameter	Test Method	Jet A-1 Pass Limit	Jet A Pass Limit	Action on Failure
API Gravity	ASTM D4052	37.0 - 51.0 deg API	37.0 - 51.0 deg API	Reject shipment
Flash Point	ASTM D56 / D3828	Min 38.0 deg C	Min 38.0 deg C	Reject shipment
Freeze Point	ASTM D5972 / D2386	Max -47.0 deg C	Max -40.0 deg C	Reject shipment
FSII Concentration	ASTM D5006 / D7154	0.10 - 0.15 % vol	0.10 - 0.15 % vol	Reject or treat
Water Reaction	ASTM D1094	Pass (1a 1b 2a 2b)	Pass (1a 1b 2a 2b)	Investigate source
MSEP Rating	ASTM D3948	Min 85 (with additive)	Min 70 (without additive)	Reject shipment
Particulate Count	ASTM D5452 / IP 423	Report cumulative	Report cumulative	Trend monitor

The table defines the pass/fail limits for each mandatory receipt test under ASTM D1655. Jet A-1 requires a stricter freeze point of minus 47 degrees Celsius compared to minus 40 for Jet A. MSEP minimums differ based on FSII content with additized fuel requiring a minimum rating of 85. A failure on API gravity flash point freeze point or MSEP results in immediate rejection of the shipment. Water reaction failures trigger an investigation into surfactant contamination before a disposition decision. Particulate counts are reported for trending rather than pass/fail at receipt but elevated counts prompt upstream filtration review. These limits align with ATA 103 Section 4 receipt requirements and form the basis for the airport quality control manual acceptance procedures. For detailed grade comparisons see Jet A vs Jet A-1 fuel key differences for buyers.

Storage Tank Quality Control: Water Drains, Microbial Monitoring, Turnover Requirements, and Tank Cleaning Intervals

Water drain frequency and bottom sampling technique

Airport jet fuel storage tanks must be drained at scheduled intervals to remove free water that collects at the tank bottom. Water enters through condensation, rainwater ingress during filling operations, or contaminated deliveries. Drain frequency depends on tank design, local climate, and throughput volume, but many operators perform bottom water draws daily or weekly during high-receipt periods. Sampling technicians use a bottom sampler or weighted bottle to collect liquid from the lowest point of the tank without disturbing settled sediment. The sample is visually inspected for haziness and tested for free water content using standard methods. Any detected water is removed before it can support microbial growth or pass downstream into filtration systems. Records of each drain, volume removed, and sample result must be retained in the tank maintenance log to demonstrate compliance with ATA 103 storage requirements.

Microbial contamination testing methods and action limits

Water bottoms in jet fuel tanks create conditions for microbial growth, including bacteria and fungi that feed on hydrocarbons and produce corrosive byproducts. Operators test water bottom samples using culture dip slides, ATP fluorescence, or laboratory culture methods to detect colony-forming units. Action limits vary by facility risk assessment, but visible slime, elevated colony counts, or corrosion indicators trigger immediate remediation. Treatment typically involves physical removal of contaminated water and bottoms followed by biocide application at approved dosage rates. Biocide selection must be compatible with jet fuel specifications and aircraft materials. After treatment, follow-up testing confirms the microbial load has fallen below the action limit before normal operations resume. Ongoing monitoring prevents filter plugging, tank corrosion, and fuel quality degradation that could reach aircraft.

Tank cleaning and internal inspection intervals

Storage tanks require periodic internal inspection and cleaning to remove sludge, rust, and sediment that accumulate over years of service. Cleaning intervals depend on tank coating condition, fuel turnover rate, and historical water control records, but many facilities schedule internal inspections every few years or after a contamination event. During cleaning, tanks are taken out of service, ventilated, and entered by trained personnel following confined space procedures. Interior coatings are examined for breakdown, and weld seams are checked for corrosion. After cleaning and before return to service, the tank is refilled with clean fuel and sampled to verify quality. A documented cleaning and inspection history supports audit readiness under ATA 103 and helps operators predict maintenance needs before tank integrity or fuel quality is compromised.

Filtration and Water Separation Systems: Filter Vessel Operation, Differential Pressure Limits, and Coalescer/Separator Maintenance

Filter vessel types and flow path configuration

Airport fuel filtration systems use filter vessels arranged to remove particulates and separate free water before fuel reaches aircraft. Common configurations include single-stage particulate filters, two-stage coalescer-separator vessels, and monitor vessels that shut down flow if water breakthrough occurs. Fuel enters the vessel, passes through coalescer elements that combine fine water droplets into larger drops, then moves through separator elements that repel water and allow clean fuel to exit. Vessel design must accommodate the required flow rate for hydrant or truck loading operations while maintaining acceptable pressure drop. Bypass lines and isolation valves allow individual vessels to be serviced without interrupting fuel supply. Operators verify vessel orientation, element seating, and gasket condition during installation and after maintenance to prevent unfiltered fuel from bypassing the treatment train.

Maximum differential pressure limits and monitoring

Differential pressure across a filter vessel increases as elements load with particulates and water. Operators monitor differential pressure with gauges or transmitters at the vessel inlet and outlet. Maximum differential pressure limits are set by element manufacturers and facility procedures, typically ranging from 15 to 25 psi depending on element type and application. When differential pressure approaches the limit, elements are scheduled for changeout to avoid flow restriction or element collapse. Exceeding the maximum limit can damage filter media, rupture seals, or force contaminants downstream. Differential pressure readings are recorded each shift or at defined transaction intervals to create a trend history. Sudden spikes may indicate a damaged element or slug of contaminated fuel, prompting immediate investigation before further product movement.

Element Type	Primary Function	Typical Max Differential Pressure	Change Criterion	Integrity Test Method
Coalescer	Combines fine water droplets	15 psi	Differential pressure limit or scheduled interval	Water flow challenge test
Separator	Repels water, passes clean fuel	15 psi	Differential pressure limit or water breakthrough	Bubble point or pressure hold test
Particulate filter	Removes solid contaminants	25 psi	Differential pressure limit	Pressure decay test
Monitor vessel	Shuts down on water breakthrough	25 psi	Water detection or differential pressure limit	Factory hydrostatic test

Coalescer and separator elements are replaced when differential pressure reaches the manufacturer limit, when water separation performance fails, or at scheduled preventive maintenance intervals regardless of pressure readings. Element changeout requires vessel depressurization, draining, and removal of end closures following lockout tagout procedures. Spent elements are disposed of as contaminated waste if they have contacted off-specification fuel. After reassembly, vessels undergo hydrostatic or air pressure testing to verify shell and seal integrity before returning to service. Test pressures and hold times follow vessel design codes and manufacturer instructions. Documentation of element serial numbers, change dates, and test results is retained in the filtration maintenance log to support audits and traceability of fuel quality control equipment performance.

Additive Injection Control: FSII and Static Dissipator Verification at Point of Injection

Required FSII concentration range for Jet A-1

The required FSII concentration range for Jet A-1 is 0.10 to 0.15 percent by volume at the point of injection into the aircraft. This range ensures adequate icing inhibition without exceeding limits that could affect fuel system materials or water separation characteristics. Concentration is verified using a refractive index method or an approved inline density correlation immediately downstream of the injection point. ATA 103 mandates that injection systems maintain this tolerance under all flow conditions. Fuel receiving the additive must be clearly identified in documentation to prevent double dosing or delivery of unadditized fuel to aircraft requiring FSII. Refractometer readings are temperature corrected using standard charts before recording.

Injection system calibration and check procedures

Injection system calibration is performed at initial commissioning and at intervals not exceeding six months or after any maintenance affecting metering accuracy. The procedure compares the additive pump stroke volume or mass flow meter reading against a calibrated volumetric prover or gravimetric test rig at the system operating pressure. ATA 103 requires the injection rate to track fuel flow proportionally within plus or minus 5 percent of the target concentration across the full delivery rate range. Daily checks confirm pump operation, stroke counter advancement, and additive tank level. Any deviation triggers an immediate shutdown and investigation before further into-plane delivery. Calibration records include date, technician, equipment serial numbers, and as-found and as-left data.

Static dissipator additive injection and verification

Static dissipator additive injection follows the same proportional control logic as FSII but targets a concentration of 1 to 3 parts per million by weight for Jet A and Jet A-1. The additive is typically injected at the refinery or terminal rather than at the airport hydrant system. Verification at the airport relies on certificate of analysis review and periodic confirmatory testing using a conductivity apparatus per ASTM D2624 or IP 274. Fuel conductivity must fall within the range of 50 to 600 picoSiemens per meter. If conductivity falls outside this range, the fuel is quarantined pending investigation. Injection equipment for static dissipator additive is calibrated annually and secured against unauthorized adjustment. Records of conductivity tests are retained with the fuel receipt documentation.

Trade Aviation Fuel on Global Trade Plaza: jet fuel on Global Trade Plaza, jet fuel suppliers and exporters, jet fuel buyers and importers, jet a1 aviation fuel fob rotterdam high quality supply from kazakhstan, aviation fuel jet 1a, petroleum oil related products on Global Trade Plaza, en 590 10ppm d6 virgin fuel jet fuel a1 available on fob dip pay tank to tank in houston and rotterdam, aviation kerosene jet a1 fuel, jet fuel a1 and jet a, jet fuel a1.

Conclusion

Operators must enforce ATA 103 mandatory requirements including daily water checks, filter differential pressure monitoring during every receipt and delivery, and FSII verification at each injection point to maintain audit compliance. The documentation chain from refinery Certificate of Quality through airport release documents must preserve unbroken batch traceability for every custody transfer. Sampling and testing at receipt must follow defined pass/fail limits for API gravity, flash point, freeze point, water reaction, MSEP rating, and particulate count before fuel enters storage.

Storage management requires scheduled water drains, microbial monitoring with defined action limits, and internal cleaning intervals based on coating condition and turnover history. Fueling vehicles and hydrant dispensers need daily water checks, monthly filter integrity tests, annual meter calibration, and documented operator training records. Request current IFQP or JIG audit reports for specific airport locations to verify supplier compliance through the last mile. For deeper technical guidance on implementing these workflows, consult the ATA 103 manual and coordinate with your local aviation authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

Spec 103 jet Fuel Quality Control Standards at Airports: a Guide?

ATA Specification 103 is the global standard governing airport jet fuel quality control from receipt through aircraft delivery. Published by Airlines for America, the 2017.2 revision mandates procedures for sampling, testing, filtration, additive injection, and personnel training to preserve fuel integrity.

Ata 103 standards for jet fuel quality control at airports?

ATA 103 establishes mandatory operational controls using "shall" language for daily water checks, filter differential pressure monitoring, and FSII verification at injection points. It bridges refinery specifications like ASTM D1655 and airport handling to ensure Jet A and Jet A-1 remain fit for flight.

Where do airports store jet fuel?

Airports store jet fuel in above-ground or underground bulk storage tanks, often within a dedicated fuel farm connected to hydrant systems or refueler loading racks. Tank design includes internal coatings, floating suction lines, and bottom water draw-off sumps to maintain quality during holding periods.

What are the two most common approved additives used in general aviation jet fuels?

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII) per MIL-DTL-85470 and Static Dissipator Additive (SDA) per ASTM D2624 are the two most common approved additives. FSII prevents ice formation at altitude while SDA ensures safe conductivity during high-flow refueling operations.

What tests are required daily for jet fuel quality control at airports?

Daily mandatory tests include Clear and Bright visual inspection, water checks on all storage tanks using bottom samplers, and filter vessel differential pressure monitoring during every receipt and delivery. FSII concentration must be verified at each injection point during additive dosing.

How often must airport fuel storage tanks be drained for water?

Storage tanks must be checked for water daily using bottom samplers and drained whenever free water is detected. ATA 103 mandates this daily check as a "shall" requirement with additional drains after receipts or when temperature changes risk condensation accumulation.

What is the maximum differential pressure allowed on a filter vessel per ATA 103?

ATA 103 requires monitoring differential pressure during every operation but sets the maximum allowable limit at 15 psi for coalescer-separator elements. Monitor cartridges have lower limits typically at 10 psi or per manufacturer specifications before mandatory element change.

What FSII concentration range is required in Jet A-1 fuel?

Jet A-1 requires FSII concentration between 0.10% and 0.15% by volume when injected at the airport. ATA 103 mandates verification at each injection point using a refractive index or portable test kit to confirm the blend remains within this range.

What training certification do airport fuel handlers need?

Fuel handlers must complete documented training covering ATA 103 procedures, emergency response, quality control testing, and equipment operation. IFQP and JIG audits verify training records include initial qualification, recurrent training intervals, and competency sign-offs for each authorized task.

How long must fuel quality records be retained?

ATA 103 requires retention of all quality control records including receipt documents, test results, filter change logs, and additive injection records for a minimum of 12 months. IFQP and JIG audits verify complete traceability from refinery Certificate of Quality through wing delivery.

What is the difference between ATA 103 and JIG standards?

ATA 103 is the procedural handling standard published by Airlines for America, while JIG is an inspection organization that audits facilities against ATA 103 using a risk-based approach scaled for smaller airports. JIG standards are followed at more than 2750 airports and supply and distribution locations as of 2026 according to the Joint Inspection Group (JIG).

How do airports test for microbial contamination in jet fuel?

Airports test for microbial contamination using dip slide culture methods or ATP fluorescence testing on water bottom samples drawn from tank sumps. ATA 103 defines action limits requiring biocide treatment and tank cleaning when colony counts or ATP readings exceed specified thresholds.

What happens if jet fuel fails quality control tests at airport receipt?

Fuel failing receipt tests is rejected and quarantined in segregated storage pending disposition by the supplier and airline quality representatives. The batch cannot enter the airport system until root cause is identified, corrective action is documented, and a retest confirms compliance with all acceptance criteria.

What are the SAF blending quality control requirements under ATA 103?

ATA 103 requires Sustainable Aviation Fuel blends to meet ASTM D7566 specification at receipt with additional verification of blend ratio documentation and Certificate of Analysis traceability. Operators must confirm the neat SAF component certification and monitor blend uniformity during receipt into airport storage.

Sources

• Joint Inspection Group (JIG) (2026): Share of world jet fuel supplied through JIG member facilities